# Is building agents still a valuable business?

> As of 2026-10-24, 1 account argues for one of this question's 3 answers in the 1 post collected, and 0 updates weigh for or against them. Argued by the most accounts: “Value sits in agent tools and rebuilt workflows” (1). SurviAGI declares no answer.

BUSINESS · Model applications and agent systems · Open since 2026-10-23

## Building agents is not valuable on its own

argued by 0 · for 0 · against 0

### Who argues it

Nobody argues this yet.

## Building agents remains valuable

argued by 0 · for 0 · against 0

### Who argues it

Nobody argues this yet.

## Value sits in agent tools and rebuilt workflows

argued by 1 · for 0 · against 0

### Who argues it

- @dotey · 2026-10-23: 搭 Agent 不值钱，给 Agent 做工具，用 Agent 重构工作流，这些更值钱些。 · [Source](https://x.com/dotey/status/2113637983333093855)

---

Page: https://surviagi.com/topics/viability-agent-building-9e4b2076

Data generated 2026-10-24T12:19:27.652524+00:00; method activity-level-1; ontology 2.4.0.
Machine-proposed: no person has reviewed these readings, and the method is not calibrated.
Cite the page address together with the generation time.